ArticlePediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Therapy After Slide Tracheoplasty.
Article in Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have focused on the respiratory management after slide tracheoplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional therapy in preventing reintubation after slide tracheoplasty.
methodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a single center, the Department of Pediatric Surgery. The medical records of 68 patients who had undergone slide tracheoplasty for congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) before the age of 2 years from February 2012 to September 2021 were included. Patients were divided into group C (conventional therapy) or H (HFNC therapy), based on whether conventional oxygen therapy and positive pressure ventilation or HFNC was used after withdrawal from the ventilator, respectively.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the postoperative reintubation rate and ventilator dependency between groups C and H. There were no HFNC complications.
conclusionsThe use of postoperative HFNC is not inferior to noninvasive ventilation in terms of therapeutic efficacy. HFNC can be used without complications for a limited time after extubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.