ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Hepatosplanchnic perfusion changes following isolated abdominal trauma and surgery: A scoping review of evidence dominated by pneumoperitoneum models.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hepatosplanchnic vascular response to isolated abdominal organ injury remains poorly defined. The aim of this review was to synthesize the available evidence on macrovascular hepatosplanchnic flow and organ-specific microvascular perfusion following isolated abdominal injury or surgery. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched through 11 May 2026 for human and animal studies reporting visceral hemodynamic changes after abdominal trauma, experimental injury, or surgery. Systematic-review methods included structured study selection, data extraction, and design-specific risk-of-bias assessment within a PRISMA-based scoping-review framework. Owing to heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Twenty-six studies were included: 14 human and 12 animal studies. Nineteen investigated pneumoperitoneum or elevated intra-abdominal pressure, four major abdominal surgery, and three other models. Perfusion reductions became more frequent with increasing pressure and were significantly more common at >15 than <10 mmHg (p = 0.031). Higher pressures also impaired compensatory mechanisms, including the hepatic arterial buffer response. After major surgery, portal and total hepatosplanchnic flow generally increased early postoperatively, while gastric mucosal perfusion deteriorated, indicating macro-microcirculatory dissociation. Only one study directly examined primary intra-abdominal injury and assessed microcirculation alone. Evidence remains indirect, heterogeneous, and methodologically limited. Studies combining serial macrovascular and organ-specific microvascular measurements are required to define the hepatosplanchnic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.