Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590976›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2026

Hepatosplanchnic perfusion changes following isolated abdominal trauma and surgery: A scoping review of evidence dominated by pneumoperitoneum models.

Vid Pivec, Andrej Bergauer, Anna Hawliczek, Nandu Goswami

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vid PivecClinical Department for Abdominal and General Surgery, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8438-2680
Andrej BergauerGravitational Physiology and Medicine Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Loewi Research Center of Vascular Biology, Immunity and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anna HawliczekGravitational Physiology and Medicine Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Loewi Research Center of Vascular Biology, Immunity and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nandu GoswamiGravitational Physiology and Medicine Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Loewi Research Center of Vascular Biology, Immunity and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-0723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hepatosplanchnic vascular response to isolated abdominal organ injury remains poorly defined. The aim of this review was to synthesize the available evidence on macrovascular hepatosplanchnic flow and organ-specific microvascular perfusion following isolated abdominal injury or surgery. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched through 11 May 2026 for human and animal studies reporting visceral hemodynamic changes after abdominal trauma, experimental injury, or surgery. Systematic-review methods included structured study selection, data extraction, and design-specific risk-of-bias assessment within a PRISMA-based scoping-review framework. Owing to heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Twenty-six studies were included: 14 human and 12 animal studies. Nineteen investigated pneumoperitoneum or elevated intra-abdominal pressure, four major abdominal surgery, and three other models. Perfusion reductions became more frequent with increasing pressure and were significantly more common at >15 than <10 mmHg (p = 0.031). Higher pressures also impaired compensatory mechanisms, including the hepatic arterial buffer response. After major surgery, portal and total hepatosplanchnic flow generally increased early postoperatively, while gastric mucosal perfusion deteriorated, indicating macro-microcirculatory dissociation. Only one study directly examined primary intra-abdominal injury and assessed microcirculation alone. Evidence remains indirect, heterogeneous, and methodologically limited. Studies combining serial macrovascular and organ-specific microvascular measurements are required to define the hepatosplanchnic response.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesLiverMicrocirculationPneumoperitoneumPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialSplanchnic CirculationAnimalsHemodynamicsHumansabdominal injuries/physiopathology [MeSH]hemodynamics [MeSH]intra‐abdominal pressure/physiology [MeSH]major abdominal surgerymesenteric arteries/physiology [MeSH]microcirculationportal vein/physiology [MeSH]scoping reviewsplanchnic circulation [MeSH]systematic review

Identifiers

PMID42590976
PMCPMC13470031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.