Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590827›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2026

Gastrointestinal Symptom-Specific Anxiety Predicts Positive SCOFF Screens in Adults With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder and May Overestimate Eating Disorder Risk.

Reem Altuwayjiri, Lee David Martin, Natalia Zarate-Lopez, Chiara Vari, Rabia Topan, Qasim Aziz, Asma Fikree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reem AltuwayjiriUniversity College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3048-3141
Lee David MartinUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, GI Physiology Unit, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-5271
Natalia Zarate-LopezUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, GI Physiology Unit, London, UK.
Chiara VariUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, GI Physiology Unit, London, UK.
Rabia TopanBlizard Institute, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Qasim AzizBlizard Institute, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-2065
Asma FikreeUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, GI Physiology Unit, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4965-757X

Funding

Ehlers-Danlos SocietyEhlers-Danlos Support UKthe Sandhu Charitable Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) is a questionnaire that screens for risk of eating disorders. Some symptoms and psychological factors associated with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) may resemble the features of eating disorders, potentially overestimating the risk of eating disorders in populations with high DGBI prevalence such as those with Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder (hEDS/HSD). This study aimed to identify factors associated with screening positive on SCOFF among adult with hEDS/HSD to explore the questionnaire's suitability for this population.

methodsA secondary analysis of data from 670 adults with hEDS/HSD recruited from Ehlers-Danlos Support UK and tertiary Neurogastroenterology. χ

resultsDGBI presence did not predict a positive SCOFF screen. However, high gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety (GSA) (AOR: 3.19, p < 0.001), fear of aversive consequences from eating (AOR: 1.97, p = 0.013), and anxiety (AOR = 2.53, p < 0.001) were significant predictors. Notably, high GSA strongly predicted a positive response to questions two (Do you worry you have lost Control over how much you eat?) and five (Would you say that Food dominates your life?) (Q2 AOR = 2.58, p = 0.006, Q5 AOR = 5.98, p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn hEDS/HSD, high GSA strongly predicted a positive SCOFF screening outcome, suggesting that SCOFF's questions might detect behaviors associated with worries around GI symptoms rather than an eating disorder. Positive screens in this population should be interpreted with caution and accompanied by GSA-focused assessments to enhance biopsychosocial management.

Indexed as

AnxietyEhlers-Danlos SyndromeFeeding and Eating DisordersGastrointestinal DiseasesJoint InstabilityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultanorexia nervosaanxietyDGBIeating disordersgastrointestinal symptoms‐specific anxietyhypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndromeIBSjoint hypermobilitySCOFF

Identifiers

PMID42590827
PMCPMC13469731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.