ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of Physics-Informed and Data-Driven Surrogate Models for Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Power transformers are critical components of modern power grids, and their operational reliability directly affects power system security, stability, and continuity. With the increasing intelligence and complexity of power systems, condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of transformers have received growing attention. However, conventional diagnostic methods often face limitations such as complex modeling procedures, high computational costs, weak adaptability, and insufficient generalization under nonlinear and coupled operating conditions. In recent years, surrogate models have emerged as effective tools for transformer fault diagnosis because of their advantages in high-dimensional nonlinear mapping, rapid prediction, and data-driven approximation. This paper systematically reviews the research progress of surrogate models in transformer fault diagnosis and establishes a classification framework from the perspectives of model types, modeling strategies, data sources, and application scenarios. The principles, applicable conditions, and performance characteristics of representative surrogate models are comparatively analyzed. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of different surrogate modeling approaches are discussed in terms of diagnostic accuracy, stability, generalization ability, interpretability, and computational efficiency. Although surrogate models show strong potential for intelligent transformer fault diagnosis, challenges remain in small-sample learning, data quality dependence, model interpretability, and cross-condition generalization. Future research should focus on multi-source information fusion, integration of physical mechanisms with data-driven learning, lightweight intelligent modeling, and standardized evaluation systems. This review aims to provide methodological guidance and technical references for the development of reliable, efficient, and interpretable transformer fault diagnosis methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.