ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dual-Expert Landmark Localization in 3D Facial Point Clouds Under Controlled Synthetic Local Surface Loss for Rigid Initialization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Local surface loss can destabilize landmark-based rigid initialization in three-dimensional (3D) facial point clouds. We propose a dual-expert framework for localizing five anatomical landmarks under controlled synthetic surface loss. The Clean expert is optimized for peak-based localization on complete surfaces, whereas the Occlusion expert combines local coordinate regression, visibility estimation, heteroscedastic modeling, and a global structural prior. A model-output reliability gate removes dependence on the protocol-supplied surface-loss ratio. For scenes not classified as reliably complete, the Occlusion expert provides the default and fallback prediction, while a validation-selected Clean residual is applied only under landmark-wise agreement. On a subject-independent FaceScape test set, mean localization errors were 0.470±0.688, 1.159±1.093, and 2.216±2.169 mm at 0%, 30%, and 50% surface loss. The method significantly outperformed the Unified occlusion-aware and structure-robust (OASR) model and the Occlusion expert at 30% and 50% loss after Holm correction and achieved lower error than Unified OASR in 22 of 24 structured-corruption conditions. In a controlled large-pose stress test, initialization achieved 100% iterative closest point (ICP) success versus 98.82% for the two-stage stratified graph convolutional network (2S-SGCN) baseline and improved coarse alignment, whereas post-ICP accuracy did not differ significantly. These results support robust rigid initialization under controlled synthetic surface loss on FaceScape; generalization to real sensor-acquired point clouds remains to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.