ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Electroencephalography-Based Emotion Recognition Using Auditory Stimulation for Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although electroencephalography (EEG)-based emotion recognition is a promising approach for affective brain-computer interface (BCI) applications, substantial inter-subject variability continues to limit its generalizability. This study proposed an EEG-based framework to recognize emotions within a valence-arousal model using auditory stimulation. Predefined emotional states were established using validated affective video clips and subsequently evaluated through EEG responses elicited by instrumental melodies. Three EEG features, which include discrete wavelet transform (DWT), functional connectivity (FC), and effective connectivity (EC), together with their combined feature set, were systematically evaluated using five machine learning classifiers. Performance was assessed under subject-dependent, subject-independent (leave-one-subject-out, LOSO), and few-shot subject-adaptation protocols. The results showed that DWT achieved the highest subject-dependent classification accuracy (0.88), followed by the combined feature set (0.84). In contrast, the subject-independent LOSO evaluation yielded near-chance performance across all feature domains (0.23-0.30), highlighting substantial inter-subject variability. Few-shot subject adaptation using 25-75% subject-specific calibration data substantially improved subject-independent performance, with the highest accuracy of 0.77 achieved by FC at 75% calibration. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of EEG-based emotion recognition using auditory stimulation under predefined affective conditions and provide a foundation for the future development of personalized affective brain-computer interface systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.