ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Radiation-Aware Path Planning Framework for Mobile Robots in Dynamic Hazardous Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a radiation-aware path planning framework for mobile robots operating in hazardous environments containing radiation sources, shielding structures, and moving obstacles. The proposed method integrates A*-based global planning, chaotic particle swarm optimization (CPSO)-based route refinement, B-Spline trajectory smoothing, and exposure-dependent speed adaptation within a unified dynamic planning architecture. The framework represents the radiation field as a physically parameterized dose-rate map in mSv/h by combining inverse-square source decay with line-of-sight material attenuation through shielding materials. Route generation is therefore evaluated in terms of cumulative absorbed dose, path length, mission time, trajectory roughness, computational cost, success rate, and dynamic obstacle interaction. The proposed method is compared with Pure A*, Informed RRT*, A*-PSO, A*-CPSO, and a risk-aware A*+DWA baseline under identical seed sets and computational budgets. In static scenarios, the proposed method reduced cumulative absorbed dose by approximately 33.3%, 47.2%, and 21.4% compared with Pure A* under low-, medium-, and high-risk conditions, respectively. In dynamic scenarios, the corresponding dose reductions were approximately 32.5%, 41.4%, and 40.1%. Additional ablation, sensitivity, statistical significance, and latency analyses were conducted to isolate the contribution of each component and evaluate computational feasibility. The results show that the proposed framework provides a balanced trade-off between absorbed dose reduction, trajectory feasibility, mission time, and online replanning performance under the tested simulation conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.