ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Usability Evaluation of a Smart Textile-Based Cushion System for Ubiquitous Breathing Exercises.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smart textiles offer promising opportunities to address multiple aspects of relaxation-focused mental health interventions, which include monitoring and therapy. This paper presents a usability evaluation of a cushion-based smart textile system called Amiga, designed to guide users through breathing exercises that could be used in the future to support relaxation-focused interventions intended for independent use. A experimental user study with 20 participants was conducted to assess the system's effectiveness, user performance, user experience, and overall satisfaction using structured interviews and validated usability questionnaires. The system achieved a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 81.875 with standard deviation (σ = 11.8), exceeding the established SUS benchmark of 68 and corresponding to the 'Excellent' category rating, under a predefined assistance-free criterion. The system was designed for respiratory phases (Ph) and respiration rate (RR) monitoring through a guided-breathing exercise where 90% completed with only 40% passing the quality criteria, achieving an average pace synchronization accuracy (PSA) of 61.2 % and phase duration accuracy (PDA) of 30% with a tolerance of ±1 s, thus providing a initial baseline for autonomous use and highlighting opportunities to improve on-boarding and in-application guidance. Most participants reported positive feedback regarding their confidence and overall satisfaction. Usability challenges were identified related to physical interaction with the cushion and clarity of on-screen instructions, providing clear directions for future design refinement. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of smart textile-based devices for home-based breathing exercises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.