Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590707›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

ActiveInspect: GRPO-Optimized Multi-Sensor Evidence Selection for Industrial Defect Detection.

Jingyuan Wang, Ming Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingyuan WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China.
Ming WuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven and Member Flanders Make, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3582-4881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated visual inspection is a cornerstone of modern manufacturing quality assurance, yet the effectiveness of any detection system is fundamentally bounded by the informativeness of the observations it receives. Most vision-language model (VLM) and reinforcement learning methods for industrial defect detection assume a fixed set of observations and optimize only the reasoning applied to them. We introduce ActiveInspect, which formulates inspection as budget-constrained sequential selection of multi-view, multi-modal evidence. Starting from a pre-acquired observation pool, a single policy selects an additional view or modality, zooms into a candidate region, retrieves a matched normal reference, or terminates with a verdict. The policy is initialized by perception-activated supervised fine-tuning (PA-SFT) and subsequently optimized by group relative policy optimization (GRPO) using inspection-specific rewards. Depth and point-cloud measurements are converted into VLM-compatible geometric renderings, while a structured memory integrates evidence across inspection steps. Evaluation on Real-IAD D

Indexed as

3D anomaly detectionactive sensingactive visual inspectiongroup relative policy optimizationindustrial defect detectionmulti-sensor fusionmulti-view inspectionvision–language model

Identifiers

PMID42590707
PMCPMC13468834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.