ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Event-Based Safety Indicator Analysis of a Surround View Monitoring (SVM)-Based Pedestrian Detection System Using Real-World Urban Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pedestrian safety in urban areas remains a critical concern, especially for vehicles with large blind spots. This study examined associations between surround view monitoring (SVM)-defined risk zones and safety-related indicators using real-world driving data from school zones and pedestrian crash-prone areas in Seoul, South Korea. Vehicle on-board diagnostics, RTK positioning, SVM object-detection outputs, and video data were collected, and vehicle-vulnerable road user interactions were reconstructed as events. Detection-to-braking time (DBT), time to collision (TTC), time-exposed TTC (TET), time-integrated TTC (TIT), TIT/TET, and jerk were used to compare danger and warning zones. The danger zone showed lower estimated TTC and higher TIT/TET values than the warning zone, indicating shorter time margins and higher average risk intensity during below-threshold TTC intervals. The warning zone showed higher longitudinal jerk, suggesting repeated vehicle-control adjustments during longer events. In the four-day repeated-driving dataset, the 95th percentile total jerk in the danger zone decreased over time; however, this uncontrolled trend was interpreted as exploratory rather than causal. These findings suggest that SVM-defined risk zones are associated with differences in event-level risk and vehicle dynamic indicators, supporting their potential use in event-based safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.