Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590698›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

SFC-YOLO: An Accuracy-Enhanced and Parameter-Efficient YOLO Framework for Small Vehicle Detection in Aerial Images.

Jinwei Zuo, Qiyi He, Fulin Liu, Jieying Liu, Minlong Hu, Yiguo Wang, Tingting Zhang, Yiming Yang, Qiao Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinwei ZuoSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.
Qiyi HeSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.
Fulin LiuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.
Jieying LiuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4534-992X
Minlong HuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.ORCID 0009-0006-4971-1446
Yiguo WangSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.ORCID 0009-0001-0184-5350
Tingting ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.ORCID 0009-0007-1310-4457
Yiming YangSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.
Qiao LinSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.

Funding

Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation JCZRQN202500217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small vehicle detection in aerial images is important for intelligent transportation, low-altitude inspection, urban monitoring, and vision-based sensing systems. Vehicles in aerial images often occupy few pixels and are affected by complex backgrounds, shadows, viewpoint changes, weak texture, and similar class appearances, which can cause missed detections and false alarms. To address these issues, this paper proposes SFC-YOLO, an accuracy-enhanced and parameter-efficient framework based on YOLO11n. A Feature Complementary Block (FCB) is placed at the P5/32 high-level feature stage to enhance local-detail and semantic-context compensation; a Dynamic Feature Alignment Upsampling unit (DFAU) is inserted into the first P5-to-P4 upsampling path to improve content-adaptive feature alignment; and a P5-only Hidden-State Attention (HSA) module is used in the final P5 detection branch to strengthen global semantic interaction. Experiments on the VEDAI eight-class vehicle dataset show that SFC-YOLO reduces the parameter count from 2.584 M to 2.466 M while improving the five-run mean Precision from 0.602 to 0.665, Recall from 0.599 to 0.608, and mAP50 from 0.614 to 0.652. Since the GFLOPs increase from 6.3 to 8.4, SFC-YOLO should be interpreted as a parameter-reduced but not FLOP-reduced framework. The main trade-off is improved detection accuracy with fewer trainable parameters at the cost of higher theoretical computation. Five repeated experiments yield an average mAP50 of 0.6523 ± 0.0117, quantifying the run-to-run variation under the current training protocol.

Indexed as

aerial image detectiondynamic upsamplinghidden-state attentionintelligent transportationparameter-efficient detectionsmall vehicle detectionYOLO11n

Identifiers

PMID42590698
PMCPMC13469192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.