Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590686›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Layered NSGA-II Method for LEO Target Census Constellation Design.

Changshou Quan, Ping Jian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Changshou QuanSchool of Space Information, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China.
Ping JianSchool of Space Information, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China.

Funding

National Key Laboratory of Space Target Awareness and the Project of Research on Scenar-io-Oriented Collaborative Perception Systems STA2024KGJ0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the pressure of space target census posed by low-orbit mega-constellations such as Starlink, this paper proposes an LEO target census constellation design method based on a layered NSGA-II algorithm. Six decision variables-orbital altitude, inclination, number of orbital planes, number of satellites per plane, sensor field of view, and focal length-are considered. Coverage rate, revisit period, and constellation cost are taken as optimization objectives to establish a multi-objective optimization model. To overcome the issues of slow convergence and susceptibility to local optima in high-dimensional decision spaces faced by classical multi-objective optimization algorithms, the decision variables are divided into the orbit layer, configuration layer, and sensor layer. NSGA-II evolution is performed layer by layer, with elite retention and global archive passing of high-quality solutions. Using high-precision 24-h ephemeris of 496 Starlink satellites generated by STK as the simulation object, the proposed layered NSGA-II is compared with classical NSGA-II, MOPSO, MOEA/D, and SPEA2. Results show that the layered NSGA-II achieves a hypervolume (HV) of 13.16, outperforming the other algorithms. Under the condition of maintaining 99.6% coverage, the recommended constellation solution achieves a revisit period as low as 7.6 h and a constellation cost of 0.429, demonstrating significantly better comprehensive performance than other algorithms. Convergence speed is improved by approximately 36% compared to classical NSGA-II. This method provides an efficient and engineering-applicable optimization approach for LEO target census constellation design.

Indexed as

constellation designlayered NSGA-IILEO target censusmulti-objective optimizationStarlink

Identifiers

PMID42590686
PMCPMC13468824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.