ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Low-Patching-Error Fiber Bragg Grating Multi-Dimensional Force Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to avoid the difficulties caused by patching-errors in fiber Bragg grating multi-dimensional force sensors, this paper applies equal strength beam structure to a crossbeam elastic element, designs and implements an improved fiber Bragg grating multi-dimensional force sensor and constructs a calibration testing system to load and test the sensor. The results show that the sensitivity change rate of the improved elastic body is significantly better than that of the traditional crossbeam elastic element. The sensitivity change rate in the X or Y directions is only about 11% of the traditional crossbeam, and the z-direction is only about 35% of that of the traditional crossbeam, greatly reducing the requirement for the accuracy of sensitive component patching. The repeatability and the hysteresis of the FBG three-dimensional force sensor are better than 1% of the full scale (200 N). The measurement error of the improved sensor in the X direction is 0.27 N, which is lower than the 0.9 N of the traditional crossbeam sensor. In the Z direction, the measurement error of the improved sensor is 0.62 N, significantly lower than the 5.73 N of the traditional crossbeam. In summary, the measurement accuracy of the FBG three-dimensional force sensor based on the improved elastic element has been significantly improved. The work presented in this article can also be applied to other forms of multi-dimensional force sensors, providing important technical references for the mass production and performance improvement of multi-dimensional force sensors, and has significant engineering implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.