ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rate-Dependent Hysteresis Modeling and Hybrid Inverse Compensation Control for Piezoelectric Actuators.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piezoelectric ceramic actuators are widely used in precision positioning and sensor-integrated micro-motion systems, but their accuracy is limited by asymmetric, rate-dependent hysteresis and by residual disturbances that remain after feedforward linearization. This study develops a self-contained modeling and control framework that combines an explicit rising/falling branch polynomial model, frequency-dependent coefficient maps, direct inverse feedforward compensation, and disturbance-observer-based adaptive sliding-mode feedback. The actuator is represented as a multilayer piezoelectric stack coupled to an equivalent electrical-mechanical-sensing plant. A branch-state logic resolves the multivalued inverse mapping, and a numerical order-sensitivity study shows that the seventh-order model provides the lowest validation RMSE while avoiding the endpoint growth observed at higher orders. Laboratory measurements at 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz, together with attenuated, triangular, random-amplitude, step, and 2 Hz sinusoidal tests, are used for validation. The proposed branch model reduces static maximum relative fitting error from 4.50-6.21% for the classical P-I model to 1.28-2.58%. Direct inverse compensation reduces linearity error from 8.56-13.88% to 0.53-1.024%, and the hybrid controller achieves a 1% settling time of 8.6 ms, a maximum tracking error of 0.0051 micrometers, and an RMSE of 0.0012 micrometers. The results demonstrate an embedded-oriented compromise between model accuracy, online computational simplicity, and robust closed-loop precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.