ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Non-Contact Phenotypic Measurement and Body Mass Prediction of
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address systematic errors in prawn total length measurement caused by natural curvature and challenges in body mass prediction under random postures in aquaculture, this study proposes an automated phenotypic measurement and body mass prediction framework integrating skeleton-based nonlinear length estimation and multi-view feature analysis. Instance segmentation (YOLO11n-seg) obtains prawn head and abdomen masks. A skeleton-based procedure combining Zhang-Suen thinning, branch pruning, and graph-based path extraction obtains the projected body centerline for curved length measurement, while a curvature index quantifies body curvature. Body mass prediction models are built for side-view and top-view data, with SHAP analysis interpreting feature contributions. A unified random forest model using consistent morphological features enables body mass prediction across side-view and top-view samples. When evaluated against the independently acquired manual two-segment reference, the skeleton-based method achieved an MAE of 0.399 cm for severely curved prawns, representing reductions of 70.3%, 66.0%, and 21.9% relative to the straight-line method, MBR method, and Zhang-Suen baseline, respectively. On an independent test set, side-view and top-view models achieved mean absolute percentage errors of 5.73% and 5.82%, respectively. The unified RF model achieved an overall MAPE of 5.54%, and paired comparisons did not detect statistically significant differences from the corresponding viewpoint-specific models on either test subset. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for non-contact prawn phenotyping under controlled imaging conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.