ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Language-Guided Dual-Mode Policy for Dual-Arm Manipulation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual-arm robot manipulation tasks are highly complex, and different tasks can be categorized as dual-arm synchronous coordination or asynchronous sequential execution. Existing action-generative policies adopt a fully parameter-sharing single-network architecture in multi-task learning, overlooking the differences between these two task types in terms of temporal dependencies and action distributions, which leads to cross-mode interference. To address this limitation, we propose LGDM (Language-Guided Dual-Mode Policy), a language-guided dual-mode policy framework. Under shared language embeddings, it parallelly constructs dual-conditional branches for language routing and visual perception. The execution layer selects independent synchronous or asynchronous policy branches according to routing signals and outputs actions by combining them with perceptual features, thereby explicitly decoupling the two motion modes. Specifically, the model organizes three functional modules around language embeddings as a hub: (1) a language mode routing layer that predicts motion modes from temporal information in semantics and provides mode-selection signals to the execution layer; (2) a vision perception layer that injects semantic information into the visual backbone via FiLM, enabling task-aware dynamic feature modulation; and (3) a dual-mode execution layer that builds independent synchronous and asynchronous policy branches, selects the corresponding branch according to routing, and generates actions with the modulated features. On the RoboTwin 2 dual-arm manipulation benchmark comprising six synchronous and asynchronous tasks, LGDM outperforms existing baselines, achieving an absolute improvement of 14.5 percentage points over RDT, and maintains robust execution performance under unseen temporal-coordination instruction variants at inference time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.