ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Novel Approach to Characterizing Patterns of Real-World Upper-Extremity Use During Walking and Activities of Daily Living in People with Subacute Stroke.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In accelerometer-based measurement, the inclusion of upper extremity (UE) activity during walking can overestimate real-world functional UE use in people post-stroke. This study introduces a comprehensive, accelerometer-based approach to examining real-world UE use, including the contribution of UE activity during walking, and compares UE use during walking versus ADL-based activities. People with subacute stroke wore bilateral wrist and ankle inertial measurement units (IMU) for one week (24 h/day). Agreement between UE-Total, UE-Continuous Walking and UE-ADL measures were assessed using Bland-Altman analyses. Variables were modeled using linear regression to explore step count, mobility aid use and UE motor impairment as predictors of IMU measures of real-world UE use. Agreement between UE-Total and UE-ADL measures showed minimal bias. Differences between UE-Continuous Walking and UE-ADL varied by mobility aid. UE-Continuous Walking was associated with increased UE activity and relatively greater paretic arm use compared with UE-ADL. Across UE-Continuous Walking and UE-ADL, step count was the strongest predictor of real-world UE use. UE activity during continuous walking exhibits different use patterns as compared to ADL-based activity. Accordingly, separating continuous walking-related UE activity from ADL-based UE use may improve clinical interpretation of IMU measures of real-world UE use in individuals with subacute stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.