ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Span-Prior-Guided Explainable Multimodal Neural Network Method for Final-State Quality Inspection of Hairpin Windings.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For final-state quality inspection of three-dimensional stamped hairpin windings, existing studies still lack multimodal methods that integrate mechanical geometric constraints, prior-guided fusion, and decision interpretability. This study proposes a span-prior-guided explainable multimodal neural network method and develops SPIMA-Net. The final-state images were acquired at a fixed inspection station with a fixed camera position and imaging angle under a CCD vision light source. Final-state images are used as visual inputs, while geometric priors are constructed from span measurements and model-type information. A visual branch and a span branch extract image and prior features, and a span-prior-assisted gating mechanism modulates visual features to enable collaborative fusion. Experimental results show that SPIMA-Net achieves an accuracy of 98.14%, an F1-score of 96.55%, and an AUC of 0.9983 on the test set. Its nonconforming-class F1-score is improved by 10.44, 3.04, 6.27, 1.38, and 0.66 percentage points over the image-only, span-only, direct-fusion, SE-fusion, and CBAM-fusion models, respectively, while the total number of misclassifications decreases to five. Interpretability analysis shows that the model mainly focuses on span openings, end profiles, and local abnormal regions. Relative and absolute span deviations are identified as the main mechanical geometric factors affecting final-state quality classification. The proposed method provides a neuro-mechanical fusion approach that demonstrates high discriminative performance and engineering interpretability for hairpin winding quality inspection on the investigated industrial dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.