ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Investigating Wearable Sensor Placement for Heat Risk Monitoring of Firefighters: A Skin-Ear Temperature Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In firefighting, heat stress is a significant physiological hazard that leads to an increased risk of heat-related illness. Heat-risk monitoring of core body temperature (CBT) can help identify early signs of heat strain and can be accomplished with wearable sensing technologies (WST). This study employs non-invasive temperature sensing to examine the relationship between tympanic temperature and skin temperature (ST) and across multiple on-body locations under different experimental conditions. This study was conducted with 10 healthy adults, male and female, under calm and non-calm conditions, at different times of the day, and across multiple sessions, representing moderate physiological strain similar to firefighting training activities. Tympanic temperature was used as a practical proxy for CBT and compared with ST measured at the forehead, wrist, and elbow. Bland-Altman analysis, together with the variance of differences between CBT and ST, was used to identify the most reliable on-body sensor location. Elbow sites showed lower variability for CBT than wrist sites, suggesting greater stability and suitability for wearable deployment in the context of firefighters' gear in situations where forehead placement is considered impractical. Results show that variability is affected by activity state, time of day, sex, and anatomical location. Findings consist of preliminary evidence informing the most suitable placement of a wearable sensor for heat risk monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.