ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quantifying Randomness in Stochastic Bit Sequences.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in the field of communications and cryptology have attracted significant research efforts in studying randomness of bit sequences. Randomised bit sequences play a vital role in sensor applications by ensuring security (i.e., protecting against brute-force, replay, and eavesdropping attacks in wireless networks) and reliable signal processing (i.e., in sensor multiplexing schemes such as code-division or time-division schemes). Such bit sequences enable spread-spectrum techniques, which allow an improved signal separation in dense networks such as structural health monitoring. Furthermore, unpredictability is essential for secure communication among sensors, as seen in fiber Bragg grating systems. The mentioned studies have led to the development of different test methodologies, such as the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) test suite, whose main objectives are to verify the independence of the individual elements in the sequence and to test their distribution within the bitstream. In this article, industry-relevant use cases are discussed for the application of random bit sequences and a gap-based approach for analysing bit sequences is presented and used together with a NIST-specified test. We introduce a simplified non-IID test approach (independent and identical distribution) to indicate whether the commonly considered IID characteristics of random variables are violated. To validate the proposed approach, this study employs different polynomial and nonpolynomial sequence generation methods. Furthermore, random sequences generated by different methods in hardware are included in the verification tests. The results confirm that the proposed methods of randomness assessment effectively indicates the non-IID characteristics of randomised bit sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.