ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
DFB-PPGSQ: Dynamic Forward-Private and Epochal Backward-Private Graph Similarity Matching Query over Encrypted Sensor Graph Databases.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In applications pertaining to sensor network, the Internet of Things, industrial monitoring, and cyber-physical security, graphs are increasingly being outsourced to clouds, where similarity search should be supported without exposing graph content, query graphs, update contents, or database evolution. Existing privacy-preserving graph similarity schemes mainly target static encrypted databases, and as such struggle to handle insertions, deletions, label updates, and long-running index maintenance. This paper proposes DFB-PPGSQ, a dynamic forward-private and epochal backward-private graph similarity matching scheme that moves branch-based lower-bound filtering into a structured encryption framework. DFB-PPGSQ uses epoch-local feature tokens, per-record occurrence handles, one-time update labels, update buffers, deletion tombstones, and shuffle-based branch-tree re-randomization to preserve pruning efficiency while making same-epoch tombstone, traversal, size, timing, and refresh leakage explicit. We formalize the system model, leakage functions, algorithms, and security interpretation, then implement a reproducible Python prototype with HMAC-SHA256 token generation and multi-profile dynamic sensor-topology workloads. Across five random seeds, DFB-PPGSQ keeps server-side filtering latency close to the static branch-tree baseline (46.60 ms versus 44.72 ms at 4000 graphs), avoids immediate full-rebuild updates (0.091 ms insertion and 0.092 ms label update), and keeps metadata-assisted cross-epoch token linkage below 5.6% attack success after refresh in additional industrial and campus IoT stress workloads. Storage, communication, exact GED refinement, side-channel hardening, and verifiable-result protection are treated as deployment costs and limitations rather than being included in the headline latency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.