ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Self-Tuning Minimal-Rule Fuzzy Logic Controller for High-Performance Induction Motor Drives.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a self-tuning minimal-rule fuzzy logic controller for high-performance induction motor drives operating under field-oriented control. Unlike conventional full-rule fuzzy controllers and reduced-rule designs with fixed post-design scaling, the proposed method combines a fixed nine-rule Mamdani inference structure with a bounded online output gain adaptation mechanism. The nominal gain and adaptation sensitivity are determined offline using Particle Swarm Optimization, thereby retaining operating-condition responsiveness without requiring online optimization, rule reconstruction, or membership-function retuning. The closed-loop behavior is analyzed using a discrete-time Lyapunov framework derived from the induction motor mechanical dynamics under bounded disturbances. The controller is evaluated through fixed-step simulations incorporating measurement noise, 12-bit signal quantization, and a one-sample computational delay. Comparative results against a conventional PI controller and a classical 49-rule fuzzy controller show that the proposed scheme achieves a rise time of 0.15 s, a settling time of 0.26 s, a post-transient mean absolute tracking error of 4 RPM, negligible overshoot, and a torque ripple of approximately 0.44 Nm. Relative to the classical 49-rule FLC, the proposed design reduces the maximum number of fuzzy-rule evaluations per control update from 49 to 9, corresponding to an 81.6% reduction in structural fuzzy-inference complexity. The results indicate a favorable simulation-level trade-off between dynamic performance, disturbance rejection, and structural algorithmic simplicity. Generated-code SIL, Hardware-in-the-Loop testing, target-processor timing measurements, and experimental implementation remain necessary to establish practical embedded feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.