ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensor Array and SMOTE-Based Algorithms for Volatile-Fingerprint Classification of Pesticide-Treated Soil with a Novel Chamber.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil pesticide-residue screening is important for ecological protection, food safety, and public health. However, conventional chromatographic and spectroscopic methods often require complex sample pretreatment, expensive instruments, trained operators, and long analysis times, which limits their use for rapid and large-scale screening. In this study, an electronic-nose system was developed for volatile-fingerprint classification of pesticide-treated loess soil. Six commercial pesticide formulations from three chemical categories were evaluated: deltamethrin and cyfluthrin as pyrethroids, glyphosate and chlorpyrifos as organophosphorus pesticides, and zineb and mancozeb as organosulfur pesticides. These compounds were selected to represent commonly used pesticides with different chemical structures and volatile profiles. A mirror-symmetric gas-sensing chamber was designed for a 26-sensor metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) array to improve gas-flow uniformity and response repeatability. A total of 960 pesticide-treated electronic-nose response curves were collected from four soil depths. Eight feature extraction methods and four classifiers were compared. The Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Geometric SMOTE (G-SMOTE) were then evaluated using training-fold-only oversampling to reduce data-leakage risk in imbalanced classification. The results showed that k-nearest neighbors (KNN) combined with direct or transform-based features provided strong classification performance under controlled laboratory conditions. For minority-class recognition, SMOTE showed more consistent improvement than G-SMOTE in the tested pesticide-depth-feature combinations, although the effect depended on feature representation and pesticide class. These findings indicate that the proposed chamber/sensor-array/SMOTE framework is feasible for rapid volatile-fingerprint classification of pesticide-treated soil, but larger independent field datasets and quantitative chemical validation are still required before general deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.