ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Indoor Mobility Patterns Measured by PIR Sensors for Classifying Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults Using Machine Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Passive infrared (PIR) sensors provide a low-cost, unobtrusive, and privacy-preserving approach for continuously monitoring daily activity in older adults. This study investigated whether indoor mobility features derived from PIR sensors could discriminate levels of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in community-dwelling older adults living alone. Mobility variables were extracted from three months of PIR sensor recordings and aggregated at the participant level for 40 individuals, who were classified into high- and low-HRQoL groups according to the EQ-5D index. A nested stratified five-fold cross-validation framework was implemented, incorporating RandomOverSampler exclusively within the training folds to address class imbalance while preserving the original distribution of the outer test folds. Three machine learning classifiers-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)-were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The SVM achieved the best overall performance, with an accuracy of 0.825±0.143, precision of 0.860±0.080, recall of 0.900±0.149, F1-score of 0.876±0.102, and AUC of 0.937±0.069. Random Forest achieved a comparable AUC of 0.933±0.109, whereas KNN showed lower overall performance and greater variability across the outer folds. Aggregated out-of-fold predictions further provided class-specific performance estimates while preserving the original participant distribution, confirming that model evaluation was conducted exclusively on non-oversampled test data. Overall, the findings support the feasibility of combining PIR-derived mobility features with interpretable machine learning models to investigate HRQoL in older adults. These results should be considered proof-of-feasibility and warrant validation in larger, independent, and more diverse cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.