ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Velocity-Sensor-Based Dual-ESO Reconstruction for Feedforward-Feedback Low-Frequency Active Micro-Vibration Isolation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-frequency base vibration transmitted through supporting platforms can degrade the stability of precision payloads, optical instruments, and inertial measurement systems. In velocity-sensor-based active isolation platforms, displacement-related feedback states are unavailable. Direct velocity integration can drift under sensor bias, while raw lower-platform velocity feedforward can introduce measurement noise and out-of-band components. This paper proposes a dual extended state observer (ESO) reconstruction method combining equivalent-displacement feedback and lower-platform feedforward. The upper-platform ESO reconstructs feedback velocity and a bounded equivalent-displacement state, while the lower-platform ESO provides a smoothed velocity reference for feedforward compensation. The method was implemented on a plate-type active vibration isolation platform and evaluated using lower-to-upper-platform acceleration transmissibility over 0.1-10 Hz. Across three repeated 200 s records, the proposed ESO feedback-feedforward condition achieved an integrated input-output suppression ratio of 38.67±0.46 dB, reduced the upper-platform output acceleration RMS to (1.31±0.09)×10-7 g, and provided a 48.92±2.12 dB RMS reduction relative to the passive baseline. Direct nominal-measured comparisons further showed that the reduced model captured the dominant passive and feedback-controlled dynamics. These results demonstrate that low-frequency active micro-vibration isolation can be achieved using only velocity measurements, without additional displacement sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.