ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multisource Sensor Fusion and Large Language Model Integration for Explainable State Perception and Anomaly Awareness.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of intelligent sensing systems, digital monitoring platforms, and multisource data acquisition technologies, accurate identification of operational states and potential risks from heterogeneous sensing signals has become an important research issue in artificial intelligence-driven sensing. Existing studies have primarily focused on either textual information understanding or behavioral data analysis, with limited attention paid to jointly modeling the consistency between textual declarations and executed behaviors. As a result, many potential risks that have not yet manifested as significant anomalies but already involve execution deviations are difficult to detect in a timely manner. To address this issue, a language-behavior consistency sensing framework for multisource sensing signals is proposed. Textual sensing signals and behavioral sensing signals are mapped into a shared state logic space, and intelligent perception and quantitative analysis of deviations between textual states and executed states are achieved through a textual state logic extraction module, an observed behavioral state modeling module, and a language-behavior consistency measurement module. Systematic experiments were conducted on a multisource sensing dataset containing public declaration texts, operation reports, behavioral logs, resource allocation records, and state-response information. The results show that the proposed method achieved the best performance in the baseline comparison experiment, with a language-behavior consistency score (LCS) of 0.742, an AUC of 0.846, an F1-score of 0.811, a Precision of 0.802, and an explanation consistency score (ECS) of 0.821, clearly outperforming advanced methods such as FinBERT, LSTM, Multimodal Transformer, and the Contrastive Multimodal Model. These results demonstrate that language-behavior consistency sensing can effectively fuse multisource sensing information and improve complex system state identification, anomaly early warning, and risk perception, providing an interpretable artificial intelligence-driven sensing framework with the potential to support industrial operation and maintenance, intelligent manufacturing, digital infrastructure management, and other intelligent monitoring scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.