Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590469›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Working-Condition-Indexed Generative Domain Generalization for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Under Unseen Conditions.

Duo Zhao, Fan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Duo ZhaoDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0009-0006-0125-9788
Fan YangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-9000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domain generalization techniques have gained widespread application in cross-domain fault diagnosis in recent years. These methods enhance model generalization capabilities without accessing target domain data, thereby improving fault diagnosis performance under unknown operating conditions. However, most existing approaches overlook the fundamental relationships between operating conditions across different domains, resulting in directionless domain generalization. To address this limitation, we propose a working-condition-indexed generative domain generalization (WCIGDG) method for fault diagnosis in data-free conditions using given working-condition parameters. Within this framework, a domain index is employed to model relationships between operating conditions across domains. A domain index predictor is constructed to guide the data generation model, enabling the generated data to better adapt to the target operating condition, while adversarial training is introduced to enhance the effectiveness of data generation. Subsequently, the generated data is combined with source domain data to train the fault diagnosis model, strengthening its adaptability to the target operating condition. Experiments are conducted on two publicly available rotating machinery fault diagnosis datasets, namely the CWRU bearing dataset and the WT planetary gearbox dataset, using rotational speed as the domain index across 68 cross-speed domain generalization tasks. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of WCIGDG for both bearing and gear fault diagnosis. Compared with SDGN, the best-performing baseline among the compared methods, WCIGDG improves the average accuracy/F1-Score by 1.22/2.72 percentage points on CWRU and 1.33/1.93 percentage points on WT.

Indexed as

adversarial learningdeep learningdomain generalizationfault diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42590469
PMCPMC13469860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.