ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Screened IMM-GRU Method for Low-Probability-of-Intercept Maneuvering Target Tracking.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the difficulty of accurate motion-model prespecification and delayed model switching in maneuvering target tracking, this paper proposes a joint model- and network-driven screened Interacting Multiple Model-Gated Recurrent Unit (IMM-GRU) method. In the filtering stage, multiple network outputs are screened using a smooth local reference trajectory constructed from measurements, providing a physically meaningful criterion for rejecting inconsistent estimates while retaining candidates compatible with local track evolution. For radar low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) operation, a difference-enhanced attention Bidirectional GRU (Bi-GRU) classifier identifies target motion modes during radar-silent intervals and supplies model priors for predictor screening. A screened IMM-GRU predictor then selects candidates using model probability, prediction uncertainty, inter-network disagreement, and local kinematic consistency. Cumulative prediction variance and measurement consistency are used to schedule radar radiation. Simulation results show that the proposed filtering and prediction modules improve tracking and extrapolation accuracy. Under the equal-accuracy LPI criterion, the proposed framework achieves the lowest four-scenario average radiation ratio at every prescribed MRMSE level from 40 to 250 m and is the only method that satisfies the 30 m MRMSE requirement in all four scenarios. These results demonstrate improved maneuvering-target tracking within the examined model and noise ranges while reducing unnecessary radar exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.