ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quality-Controlled Generative Augmentation for North Atlantic Right Whale Upcall Detection Using Contour 1D-VAE.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a Variational AutoEncoder (VAE)-based Quality Controlled (QC) generative augmentation framework for North Atlantic right whale (NARW) upcall detection. Existing generative augmentation methods can generate synthetic samples; however, they do not provide a sample-level criterion for determining whether each generated sample is a positive sample that contributes to improved detector performance or a synthetic outlier that should be removed. This study learns manually extracted upcall frequency contours using a 1D-VAE and evaluates generated contour candidates in a 10-dimensional acoustic morphology feature space. The QC score is computed with respect to the reference distribution of manually extracted real upcall contours, and stochastic acceptance probabilities for borderline samples around the hard threshold are calibrated using same-call manual re-extraction variability. QC-passed contours are converted into detector training spectrograms using smooth amplitude modulation and Gaussian noise injection based on SNR statistics. Using 30,000 acoustic segments from the Kaggle NARW dataset, Original, Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM), Contour-VAE without QC, and VAE-QC conditions were compared under the same detector and augmentation budget. VAE-QC with α = 0.97 achieved the highest mean AUC of 0.901, outperforming Original training (0.802), DDPM (0.845), and Contour-VAE without QC (0.810). Feature distribution and QC-score analyses further showed that VAE-QC suppresses morphology outlier tails observed in unfiltered generation. These results indicate that the key factor in generative augmentation is the QC process that defines feature boundaries useful for detector learning and selects synthetic positive samples accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.