ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Personalized Calibration and Hybrid Feature Fusion for Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation Using PPG and ECG Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous and noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring is important for hypertension screening and long-term cardiovascular management. Continuous BP estimation using photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiography (ECG) has become a promising alternative to conventional cuff-based measurements. However, handcrafted feature-based methods are sensitive to fiducial point detection, while end-to-end deep models often require large labeled datasets and may ignore subject-specific BP baselines. This study proposes a personalized calibration and hybrid feature fusion framework for continuous BP estimation from ECG and PPG signals. The framework integrates physiologically interpretable handcrafted features, self-supervised waveform representations, and subject-specific prior BP information to predict systolic and diastolic BP. The handcrafted branch extracts pulse transit time, heart rate variability, and PPG morphological descriptors, whereas a masked reconstruction-based self-supervised encoder learns latent waveform embeddings without BP labels. Personalized calibration incorporates base BP from the earliest calibration file through an alpha-weighted strategy, and the fused representation is fed into XGBoost regressors. The framework was evaluated on a private dataset and the BP-UCI dataset, achieving SBP/DBP MAEs of 7.25/3.98 mmHg and 7.85/4.02 mmHg, respectively. Comparative and ablation results indicate improved baseline performance in the current experimental setting, suggesting the methodological feasibility of the proposed framework for small-sample continuous BP estimation. Further validation with larger and more diverse cohorts is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.