ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Laser Shock Peening of Gear Steels and Related Metallic Materials: Near-Surface States, Surface Integrity, and Component-Level Applications.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contact fatigue, bending fatigue, and wear failures in gears are governed by the stress state, hardening gradient, microstructural stability, and surface topography within the near-surface and subsurface regions. For tooth flanks, rolling-sliding contact, asperity interaction, lubricant-film disturbance, and subsurface shear stress control micropitting, pitting, and spalling. For tooth-root fillets, local stress concentration and surface or near-surface defects dominate bending-fatigue crack initiation. Laser shock peening (LSP) introduces deep compressive residual stress, gradient hardening, and microstructural refinement, and is therefore relevant to gears when these effects are matched to the critical damage zones. This review examines LSP of gear steels and related load-bearing steels from the viewpoint of tooth-flank and tooth-root damage control. It links laser parameters, shock-induced plastic deformation, residual-stress depth, hardening response, surface roughness, and profile accuracy to bending fatigue, rolling contact fatigue, and wear behavior. LSP is most effective when the compressive residual-stress layer and hardened layer reach the contact- or bending-damage depth while lubrication compatibility, flank form accuracy, and subsequent finishing are preserved. Excessive pulse energy, overlap, or unstable absorbing/confining conditions may increase roughness, produce ablation or micropitting-sensitive defects, and compromise tooth profile accuracy. Thus, LSP for gears should be evaluated together with carburizing, nitriding, shot peening, surface rolling, polishing, coatings, and laser texturing rather than as an isolated treatment. The central task is to define gear-specific process windows that balance residual-stress depth, surface integrity, dimensional accuracy, and manufacturing repeatability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.