ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Metrological Evaluation of Dimensional and Surface Roughness of Thermoplastic PLA Parts in High-Speed MEX 3D Printing Using a Dodecahedron Benchmark Geometry.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the influence of process conditions on the dimensional accuracy, geometric deviations, and surface quality of PLA parts manufactured using high-dynamics material extrusion (MEX) technology. The aim was to identify the dominant sources of variability and to assess within-condition manufacturing consistency and inter-machine consistency. The investigation considered two 3D printers, nine build locations on the working platform, two printing strategies (layer-by-layer and model-by-model), and model face orientation. Additionally, an exploratory comparison of aligned and random seam configurations and an analysis of local temperature variations within the build chamber were performed. Regular dodecahedron geometries were manufactured using a Bambu Lab P1S system and processed under identical high-quality printing parameters. Dimensional measurements were performed using a Linear 100 universal length measuring machine, while full-field geometric deviations were acquired using a GOM Scan 1 structured-light 3D scanner. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured with a MarSurf XR 20 profilometer. Part orientation is the dominant source of dimensional variability, representing the largest relative contribution to linear deviation in the mixed-effects model (ΔR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.