Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590314›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Time-Dependent Transition in the Re-Tempering Behavior of Cement Mortar.

Jun-Cheol Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jun-Cheol LeeDepartment of Architecture, Seowon University, Cheongju 28674, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Construction delays frequently reduce the workability of cement mortar, and re-tempering by adding extra water is commonly practiced to restore its fluidity. Although re-tempering improves fresh-state workability, it may simultaneously impair the hardened properties of mortar. This study investigated the combined effects of waiting time (0, 15, 30, and 45 min) and additional water content (0, 2, and 4% of the initial mixing water) on the fresh and hardened properties of cement mortar under controlled laboratory conditions. Mortar flow, compressive strength, and 28-day water absorption were evaluated to characterize the re-tempering behavior. Re-tempering effectively restored workability; however, its recovery efficiency decreased with increasing waiting time. In contrast, compressive strength decreased, and water absorption increased progressively as both waiting time and additional water content increased. To quantitatively evaluate the balance between workability recovery and strength deterioration, a dimensionless Workability-Strength Trade-off Ratio (WSTR) was introduced as a comparative indicator based on normalized flow recovery and normalized 28-day strength loss. WSTR consistently decreased with increasing waiting time, with a marked reduction after approximately 30 min, indicating that the engineering benefit of re-tempering diminished as hydration progressed. These findings demonstrate that the dominant effect of re-tempering gradually shifts from workability recovery to deterioration of hardened properties, providing a quantitative framework for evaluating re-tempering under construction delay conditions. The findings should be interpreted within the investigated experimental conditions, and further studies involving different mortar mixtures and material systems are required to validate the proposed interpretation.

Indexed as

cement mortarcompressive strengthre-temperingtime-dependent transitionworkability recovery

Identifiers

PMID42590314
PMCPMC13466440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.