ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Improving Reproducibility of Eddy-Current-Based Coating Thickness Estimation with Printed Circuit Board-Based Differential Coils.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate determination of the thickness of the metallic coating on steel substrates is essential in industrial quality control. Eddy current testing offers a non-destructive solution by evaluating the impedance or mutual impedance of one or multiple coils. Analytical models exist in the literature for selected sensor configurations. Building on these models, a model-based estimation approach can be applied to derive an estimate for coating thickness and other relevant material and geometry parameters. Conventional setups typically employ wire-wound coils. However, manufacturing tolerances introduce discrepancies between nominal and actual coil geometries, which lead to deviations in the coating thickness estimate. A printed circuit board (PCB)-based coil with lithographically defined geometry achieves substantially tighter fabrication tolerances and higher repeatability than wire-wound coils. In this work, an analytical mutual impedance model for a differential multi-layer PCB pancake coil is derived and validated against established models in the literature with respect to forward modeling accuracy and model-based parameter estimation performance. Furthermore, experimental measurements with two-layer and eight-layer PCB differential coil systems produce parameter estimates with significantly better reproducibility than wire-wound coils. The experimental results show that the two-layer PCB coil achieves close agreement between the absolute estimated parameters and the reference values without requiring additional calibration, while maintaining high sensitivity to coating thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.