Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590256›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Optimizing Process Parameters in Laser Transmission Welding Solid PC/Porous-PET Using Prediction Models: Experimental Validation and Morphology Analysis.

Jinqiang Li, Yitao Wu, Xiangsheng Luo, Siyu Zhou, Zijian Wang, Huang Zhang, Bowen Zhong, Haiyu Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinqiang LiSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Yitao WuSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Xiangsheng LuoSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Siyu ZhouSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Zijian WangSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Huang ZhangSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Bowen ZhongSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Haiyu QiaoSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M730350National Natural Science Foundation of China 52405400Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20240801Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China 23KJB460028Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Soochow University S202510285095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining optimal process parameters for laser transmission welding (LTW) of solid/porous materials remains challenging due to the complexity of influencing factors. In this study, the welding of solid polycarbonate (PC) and porous polyethylene terephthalate (porous-PET) was chosen as an exemplary case and the relationship between parameters and welding quality was established using a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model. First, the experimental dataset, comprising welding power, welding speed, PC thickness, and porous-PET density, is established based on a flexible factor-level design. Then, the optimized GPR model trained based on the full experimental dataset achieved high predictive performance, significantly outperforming that trained with the averaged experimental dataset. Next, using the optimal prediction model as the objective function, three different optimization methods, genetic algorithm (GA), Bayesian optimization (BO), and covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES), are employed to optimize the process parameters, and the performance of the different optimization algorithms shows that CMA-ES has demonstrated the fastest convergence and the shortest runtime, while still converging to the same recommended parameters as GA and BO. Experimental validation confirms the accuracy of the recommended parameters, with a low relative error. Morphological analysis confirms that the weld seam is uniformly formed at recommended parameters. The proposed strategy provides an efficient route for achieving high-performance LTW joints and shows strong potential for improving process efficiency and reducing manufacturing cost in solid/porous materials joining.

Indexed as

Gaussian process regressionlaser transmission weldingmachine learningprocess optimizationsolid/porous polymer joining

Identifiers

PMID42590256
PMCPMC13466696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.