ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optimizing Process Parameters in Laser Transmission Welding Solid PC/Porous-PET Using Prediction Models: Experimental Validation and Morphology Analysis.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining optimal process parameters for laser transmission welding (LTW) of solid/porous materials remains challenging due to the complexity of influencing factors. In this study, the welding of solid polycarbonate (PC) and porous polyethylene terephthalate (porous-PET) was chosen as an exemplary case and the relationship between parameters and welding quality was established using a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model. First, the experimental dataset, comprising welding power, welding speed, PC thickness, and porous-PET density, is established based on a flexible factor-level design. Then, the optimized GPR model trained based on the full experimental dataset achieved high predictive performance, significantly outperforming that trained with the averaged experimental dataset. Next, using the optimal prediction model as the objective function, three different optimization methods, genetic algorithm (GA), Bayesian optimization (BO), and covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES), are employed to optimize the process parameters, and the performance of the different optimization algorithms shows that CMA-ES has demonstrated the fastest convergence and the shortest runtime, while still converging to the same recommended parameters as GA and BO. Experimental validation confirms the accuracy of the recommended parameters, with a low relative error. Morphological analysis confirms that the weld seam is uniformly formed at recommended parameters. The proposed strategy provides an efficient route for achieving high-performance LTW joints and shows strong potential for improving process efficiency and reducing manufacturing cost in solid/porous materials joining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.