Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42590226›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Regulation and Use of Cannabidiol in Croatia Compared with Selected European and International Models: From Consumer Products to Clinical Practice.

Ana Batinic, Antonia Zecic, Zeljko Dujic, Davorka Sutlovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana BatinicPharmacy of Split-Dalmatia County, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Antonia ZecicDepartment of Natural and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Forensic Sciences, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0003-6583-6722
Zeljko DujicDepartment of Integrative Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Davorka SutlovicFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9899-5119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) has attracted growing scientific and clinical interest due to its potential therapeutic applications and increasing availability across Europe. This narrative review examined the regulatory status, market availability, and clinical use of CBD in Croatia in relation to selected European Union countries and international reference models (Canada and Australia). A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by official regulatory and governmental sources. The analysis included Croatia, Germany, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Italy, France, and Finland, while Canada and Australia were discussed as international reference models. Considerable differences were identified regarding the regulation of CBD-containing products, access to medical cannabis, reimbursement policies, clinical implementation, and the role of pharmacists. Germany and the Netherlands have established well-developed systems for medical cannabis use, whereas Finland represents a more restrictive regulatory model. In Croatia, CBD-containing products are widely available, but their integration into routine clinical practice remains limited. Regulatory uncertainty, insufficient professional training, and the lack of standardised clinical guidance were identified as important barriers. The findings suggest that the expansion of the consumer CBD market has generally outpaced the integration of cannabinoid-based therapies into healthcare practice across the countries included in this review. Improved professional training and clearer clinical guidance may facilitate their evidence-based implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

cannabidiolCBDCroatiadietary supplementsEuropean Unionmedical cannabisnovel foodpharmacy practiceregulationtraining for pharmacists

Identifiers

PMID42590226
PMCPMC13467261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.