ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Clinical Practice Recommendations for Non-Dermatologists on the Diagnostic Suspicion of GPP.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, potentially life-threatening, chronic cutaneous inflammatory disease characterized by unpredictable, recurrent acute flares of painful sterile pustules on a widespread erythematous background. In addition to cutaneous manifestations, patients may experience fever, pruritus, pain, chills, and general malaise, which may be further complicated by secondary infection, sepsis, and organ failure, thus requiring urgent medical treatment and, in some cases, hospitalization. Prompt therapeutic management of the acute phase is crucial for severe cases, and proactive treatment to prevent flares should always be considered. However, early recognition of acute flares can be challenging due to the low frequency of the disease, the rapid onset of flares, the lack of hematological biomarkers and the absence of standardized diagnostic criteria. Moreover, despite the approval of new targeted therapies, there are still several unmet needs, as these treatments are highly expensive, not always readily available, and may have limited efficacy in patients with advanced or complicated disease. For these reasons, multidisciplinary round-table discussions and shared diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms involving dermatologists, who are responsible for diagnosing and treating GPP, and other medical specialists are desirable to facilitate prompt referral to dermatologists for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. We report the updated literature discussed during a multidisciplinary meeting with the aim of providing practice recommendations for clinicians involved in GPP management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.