ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in Acute Pancreatitis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases and is characterized by a highly variable clinical course ranging from mild self-limiting inflammation to severe disease associated with persistent organ failure and high mortality. Early risk stratification is essential for timely therapeutic decision-making and improved patient outcomes. Although conventional prognostic scoring systems remain widely used, their predictive performance is limited by moderate accuracy, delayed applicability and the requirement for numerous clinical or imaging parameters. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have enabled the development of predictive models capable of integrating demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging data to improve early outcome prediction. This review summarizes current evidence on the application of AI and ML in AP, focusing on the prediction of disease severity, organ failure, intensive care unit admission and mortality. We also discuss explainable AI approaches and the methodological strengths and limitations of existing models, including validation, calibration, overfitting and reproducibility. Finally, we highlight future perspectives, including multimodal AI, prospective clinical validation and regulatory considerations that should facilitate the safe integration of AI-based decision-support tools into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.