Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589893›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

The Acid-Base Effects of Albumin in Sepsis: Reconciling the Stewart Physicochemical Approach with the Traditional Buffer-Base Paradigm.

Daniele Orso, Raffaele Saro, Giorgio Della Rocca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniele OrsoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Udine University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-0343
Raffaele SaroDepartment of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Giorgio Della RoccaDepartment of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Albumin administration in sepsis and septic shock remains controversial because of uncertain clinical benefits and complex acid-base effects. Unlike crystalloids, albumin influences acid-base equilibrium through effects on chloride balance, strong ion difference (SID), buffering systems, and weak acid concentration. These effects may be interpreted differently by the traditional bicarbonate-centered framework and Stewart's physicochemical approach. In the traditional paradigm, albumin acts mainly as a non-bicarbonate plasma buffer influencing base excess and anion gap interpretation. In the Stewart framework, albumin is a weak non-volatile acid contributing to total weak acids (Atot), thereby influencing hydrogen ion dissociation and pH regulation. This narrative review compares these two approaches to albumin-related acid-base physiology in sepsis, with emphasis on chloride balance, strong ion difference, hypoalbuminemia, dilutional effects, and cardiorespiratory interactions during mechanical ventilation and septic shock. We also contextualize these mechanisms within major randomized trials of albumin and resuscitation fluids and present illustrative conceptual simulations illustrating the directional acid-base effects of different fluid compositions. The narrative review focuses on masked acidosis in hypoalbuminemic patients and on the interpretation of pH changes after albumin administration. Finally, we propose an integrated bedside framework combining traditional, physicochemical, respiratory, and hemodynamic variables for acid-base interpretation during fluid resuscitation.

Indexed as

acid–base physiologyalbumincritical carehypoalbuminemiasepsisStewart approachstrong ion difference

Identifiers

PMID42589893
PMCPMC13467214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.