ReviewPolymers2026
Modification of Surface Properties of Non-Woven Polypropylene Fabrics by Gaseous Plasma Treatment-Review and Challenges.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The scientific literature on plasma methods for modifying the surface properties of non-woven polypropylene (NWPP) fabrics is reviewed. The scientific background of the observations reported by different teams is explained, and the technological limits are highlighted. Plasma treatment usually modifies the surface layer, which is beneficial for some applications, such as grafting functional coatings onto the fibers in the surface film of NWPP fabrics. The water contact angle of NWPP fabrics treated by plasmas sustained by the classical dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure and low-pressure discharges in the range of about 10 to a few 100 Pa rarely drops below 90°, which is explained by the inability to modify fibers deep in the fabrics due to the limited penetration depth of such plasmas. The super-hydrophilic finish can be achieved either by using nanosecond-pulsed atmospheric-pressure discharges or by weakly ionized plasma with a relatively high electron temperature, sustained at a pressure of a few Pa or below. Such plasmas modify the fibers deep in the fabric, which is particularly useful for applications in respiratory masks where the fibers should be coated with ultra-thin films of virucidal substance. The energy efficiency of the latter plasmas is better because practically no gas-phase loss of reactive species occurs, and so is their scalability, making them the most suitable for modifying NWPP fabrics at an industrial scale. While most authors reported only increased wettability with increasing treatment intensity, over-treatment has been reported and is attributed to thermal effects. The range of optimal intensity has yet to be systematically quantified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.