Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589795›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Effect of Surface Treatments and Bonding Agents on Microshear Bond Strength of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Conventional Glass-Ceramics: Silane Versus Universal Adhesive.

Soner Sismanoglu, Gorkem Sengez, Aliye Tugce Gurcan, Vasfiye Isik, Zeynep Hale Keles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soner SismanogluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34500, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1272-5581
Gorkem SengezPrivate Practice, Istanbul 34000, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-109X
Aliye Tugce GurcanDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir 35380, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8444-1780
Vasfiye IsikDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34500, Türkiye.
Zeynep Hale KelesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul 34408, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-4512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the effects of four surface treatments (no treatment, hydrofluoric acid [HF] etching, aluminum oxide [AlO] air abrasion, and tribochemical silica coating [TSC]) and two bonding agents (dedicated silane vs. silane-containing universal adhesive) on the microshear bond strength of four CAD/CAM glass-ceramic materials, including two zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics and two conventional glass-ceramics. Four CAD/CAM materials (Celtra Duo, IPS e.max CAD, IPS Empress CAD, and Vita Suprinity) were subjected to four surface treatments (no treatment, HF, AlO air abrasion, and TSC) and further divided according to bonding agent application: dedicated silane (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus) or silane-containing universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal). Microshear bond strength testing was performed after 24 h of water storage (

Indexed as

CAD/CAM ceramicsmicroshear bond strengthsilane coupling agentsurface treatmentuniversal adhesive

Identifiers

PMID42589795
PMCPMC13467937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.