ArticlePolymers2026
Characterization of 2D PLA Structural Metamaterials-Methodology and Challenges for Properties Assessment.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical (or structural) metamaterials offer a paradigm shift in the mechanical response of advanced structures, achieving performance distinct from their base material through architected unit cells that geometrically tailor stress distribution. Characterising these structures demands methodologies capable of capturing localised deformations while reconciling numerical predictions with as-manufactured behaviour. This study introduces a Digital Image Correlation (DIC) based methodology for the mechanical characterisation of three two-dimensional PLA lattice metamaterials, produced by material extrusion (MEX) and selected from a computational screening of approximately 57,000 candidate geometries to span the negative, zero and positive Poisson's ratio regimes. Predicted and measured Poisson's ratios agreed to within 0.01 across all three geometries without correction, whereas structural rigidity deviated substantially from nominal geometry predictions. A targeted correction strategy, using micro-computed tomography (µCT) to measure wall thickness at high-stress concentration zones identified through finite element modelling, reduced these deviations from 46% to 7% for the auxetic geometry, and from 25% to 2% for the positive Poisson geometry. These results show that Poisson's ratio and rigidity respond differently to manufacturing-induced dimensional deviation, and that efficient, targeted geometric correction, rather than full model reconstruction, is sufficient to reconcile numerical and experimental behaviour for these structures. This approach offers a practical framework for the experimental evaluation and numerical validation of mechanical metamaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.