ArticlePolymers2026
Influence of Graphene-Derivative Surface Chemistry on the Charge-Storage Behavior of Electrospun Cellulose Acetate Membranes.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural, Thermal, and Phenol Adsorption Properties of a Humic Acid/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrospun nanocomposite membranes have attracted considerable interests for flexible energy-storage devices; however, the influence of graphene derivative surface chemistry on the electrochemical behavior of cellulose acetate-based nanocomposites remains insufficiently understood. In this work, cellulose acetate (CA) nanocomposite membranes containing graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and octadecylamine-functionalized reduced graphene oxide (rGO-ODA) at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.2 wt% were fabricated by electrospinning and evaluated as electrode materials for supercapacitor applications. The interfacial interactions and morphology of the membranes were investigated by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively, while electrochemical performance was assessed by cyclic voltammetry in three-electrode and symmetric two-electrode configurations. FTIR analysis confirmed effective interactions between the graphene derivatives and the CA matrix, whereas SEM observations revealed that nanofiller chemistry influenced fiber morphology and structural homogeneity. Among the evaluated systems, GO-containing membranes exhibited the best electrochemical performance, reaching a specific capacitance of 5.982 F/g in the three-electrode configuration. Analysis of the charge-storage mechanism using the power-law relationship revealed distinct electrochemical behavior associated with the surface chemistry of each graphene derivative. The results demonstrate that graphene-derivative chemistry governs the structure-property relationships, electrochemical response, and charge-storage behavior of electrospun CA nanocomposites, providing fundamental insights for the design of lightweight and flexible electrodes for energy-storage applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.