Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589749›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Color Adjustment and Fluorescence Matching of Single-Shade Composites: Spectrophotometric and Photographic Analysis Techniques.

Buket Karalar, Merve Nur Yılmaz, Merve Pelin Dur Sarıgüzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Buket KaralarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, 54187 Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-1246
Merve Nur YılmazDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, 14030 Bolu, Turkey.
Merve Pelin Dur SarıgüzelDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, 54187 Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9005-5694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the color adjustment of single-shade composites has been widely investigated, limited information is available regarding their fluorescence-matching performance. The aim of this study was to compare the optical performance of different composite resin systems by evaluating color adjustment under visible-light conditions and fluorescence matching under ultraviolet (UV) illumination.

methodsStandardized cervical cavities were prepared in 45 extracted human maxillary central incisors. Teeth were divided into nine groups (

resultsFI showed significantly higher ΔE values (23.01 ± 7.04) than SP (3.34 ± 1.52) and CP (3.55 ± 1.35) (

conclusionsWhile single-shade composites exhibited favorable color adjustment under visible-light conditions, they showed greater fluorescence mismatch under UV illumination. In contrast, the group-shade composite demonstrated the most stable optical performance across different evaluation methods.

Indexed as

color adjustmentcross-polarized photographyesthetic dentistryfluorescencesingle-shade compositespectrophotometer

Identifiers

PMID42589749
PMCPMC13467580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.