Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589739›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Low-Cost Qualitative Screening of Melting Ranges in Recycled Fishing Net Plastics: Comparison of Portable Handheld Device with Kofler Hot Bench and DSC.

Sylvia Waschke, Julia Tetzner, Thomas Potempa, Max Ehleben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sylvia WaschkeInstitute of Recycling (IFR), Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany.
Julia TetznerInstitute of Recycling (IFR), Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany.
Thomas PotempaInstitute of Recycling (IFR), Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4823-0924
Max EhlebenInstitute of Recycling (IFR), Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-1636-7581

Funding

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable polymer identification is a prerequisite for high-quality recycling of post-consumer fishing nets and ropes. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) provides precise thermal characterization but requires stationary laboratory infrastructure and is not applicable at coastal collection points or small-scale recycling operations. This study describes and validates Melting Box 1.0 (MB 1.0), a low-cost, field-deployable device for qualitative screening of softening and melting ranges in small polymer samples. MB 1.0 repurposes a commercial vaporizer's existing temperature-controlled heating and display functionality into a purpose-built screening tool, rather than introducing a new analytical measurement principle. Representative materials from Vietnamese fishing net recycling projects-polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyamide (PA), and PE/PP blends-were assessed with a standardized three-tier visual scale (0 = no change; * = softening; x = melting) across five replicate measurements per sample. Agreement with the Kofler hot bench is good (mean bias for T

Indexed as

differential scanning calorimetryfishing netsKofler hot benchlow-cost portable screening devicemelting rangeplastic recyclingpolyamidepolyethylenepolypropylenequalitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID42589739
PMCPMC13467709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.