ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Navigating the Complexity of PH-ILD: From Molecular Mechanisms to Integrated Clinical Evaluation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) in patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a critical, yet underrecognized, complication that affects patients' quality of life and increases mortality. Emerging evidence further suggests that PH-ILD is not merely a consequence of hypoxia and parenchymal fibrosis, as the severity of pulmonary vascular disease often correlates poorly with the extent of fibrotic lung involvement, indicating more complex underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion when symptoms appear "disproportionate" to the degree of parenchymal lung disease. Key indicators include diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 45%, a forced vital capacity to diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ratio (FVC/DLCO) > 1.6, and radiological findings of increased pulmonary artery diameter. While echocardiography and circulating biomarkers serve as useful screening tools, right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Early identification is essential for risk stratification, lung transplant evaluation, and determining eligibility for targeted pharmacological interventions, as this group of patients remains one of the most therapeutically challenging forms of pulmonary vascular disease. Ongoing research and advances in diagnostic tools are increasingly focused on refining phenotypic classification, identifying valuable biomarkers, and elucidating molecular drivers that may enable personalized treatment strategies in this heterogeneous patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.