Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589671›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Tracking Nano- and Microplastics in Plants: Uptake Pathways, Tissue Distribution, and Analytical Strategies from Microscopy to Spectroscopy.

Abdullah Maqsood, Ewa Łobos-Moysa, Amna Jameel, Ewa Dacewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdullah MaqsoodDepartment of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-4623
Ewa Łobos-MoysaDepartment of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8180-7903
Amna JameelInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Ewa DacewiczDepartment of Sanitary Engineering and Water Management, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Adam Mickiewicz Ave. 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2167-8091

Funding

Silesian University of Technology BK-239/RIE4/2026 ; 08/040/BK_26/0234Silesian University of Technology BKM-724/RIE4/2026 ; 08/040/BKM26/0241Silesian University of Technology (FESL.10.25-IZ.01-07E7/23)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nano- and microplastics (NMPs) are now widely detected across agroecosystems and can act as physiological stressors in plants. Exposure occurs through contaminated soil, irrigation water, or airborne deposition, bringing particles into direct contact with roots and above-ground tissues. Reported entry routes include apoplastic transport, cracks formed at lateral root emergence, leaf stomata, and endocytosis once particles have crossed the cell wall. Once internalized, particles may translocate through the xylem and, in some cases, the phloem, accumulating in roots, stems, and leaves depending on particle size, surface charge, and plant structural characteristics. NMPs have been associated with oxidative stress, disrupted photosynthesis, and altered metabolic pathways. Detecting NMPs within heterogeneous, hydrated plant tissues remains challenging, as particles often show low contrast against biological structures and can be mistaken for cellular components. This review examines how microscopy techniques reveal NMPs size, surface attachment, tissue distribution, and cellular-level interactions, while noting that these approaches primarily provide morphological or localization information rather than confirming polymer identity. Complementary spectroscopic and mass-based analytical methods are discussed for their role in chemical confirmation and quantification. This review supports informed selection among imaging, spectroscopic, and quantitative techniques for studying plant-plastic interactions, while highlighting current analytical challenges facing the field.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsMicroscopyNanoparticlesPlantsBiological TransportSpectrum AnalysisTissue DistributionMicroplasticsimaging techniquesmicroscopynano- and microplasticsphytotoxicityplant–plastic interactions

Identifiers

PMID42589671
PMCPMC13467223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.