ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Endobronchial Intratumoral Immuno- and Gene Therapies in Lung Cancer: Mechanisms of Local Delivery, Systemic Immune Effects, and Global Feasibility.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and durable benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited by immune exclusion, microenvironmental immunosuppression, and toxicity. This narrative translational review evaluates whether endobronchial intratumoral delivery of immuno- and gene-based therapies can transform bronchoscopic access into a therapeutic platform linking local tumour intervention with systemic antitumour immunity. We synthesise evidence on endobronchial ultrasound, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy, together with local checkpoint blockade, cytokine and mRNA-lipid nanoparticle constructs, oncolytic virotherapy, dendritic-cell approaches, viral and non-viral gene transfer, and enzyme- or metabolite-based strategies. Current clinical evidence remains preliminary, consisting mainly of Phase I trials, small prospective cohorts, and case-based signals, with feasibility and safety observations but no completed randomised trial demonstrating efficacy against standard-of-care systemic therapy. The most plausible candidates are patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, bronchoscopically accessible lesions, inadequate response to systemic immunotherapy, and immune-excluded or locally immunosuppressed tumours. Biomarkers such as PD-L1, tumour mutational burden, CD8+ infiltration, tertiary lymphoid structures, radiomics, and circulating tumour DNA require validation. This review integrates delivery technology, immune mechanisms, statistical evidence appraisal, biomarker limitations, AI-guided planning, and global feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.