ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Artificial Intelligence for Molecular Biomarker Identification in Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Cancers.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for inferring molecular biomarkers directly from digitized histopathologic slides. However, the current evidence in gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers remains fragmented across tumor types and biomarker categories. Relevant studies were systematically identified and screened according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore were searched from 1 January 2015 to the date of search. Eligible studies involved gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary malignancies, used histopathology images, applied AI-based methods, and reported molecular biomarker prediction or inference. A total of 110 studies were included. Most studies focused on colorectal, gastric, liver, and pancreatic cancers, with microsatellite instability, mutation status, molecular subtypes, and tumor mutational burden being the most commonly investigated targets. Model architectures evolved from conventional convolutional neural networks to multiple-instance learning and transformer-based methods. While many studies reported promising predictive performance, direct comparison across studies remained challenging because of substantial heterogeneity in datasets, model architectures, and validation strategies. AI-based molecular biomarker identification from pathologic slides shows substantial promise in gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers, but current evidence is constrained by heterogeneity and limited validation. Standardized, multicenter studies are needed before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.