ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
AAV Vectors in Regenerative Medicine and Cellular Reprogramming: Potential, Pitfalls, and Specificity Constraints.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The adeno-associated virus (AAV) has become the vector of choice for gene therapy and experimental gene delivery, owing to its non-pathogenic nature and ability to achieve persistent gene expression across diverse tissues. AAV has emerged as a key platform in cellular reprogramming and regenerative medicine, with applications spanning transcription factor delivery for in vivo lineage conversion and tissue repair across the CNS, heart, and musculoskeletal systems. However, significant limitations remain, particularly in the context of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) engineering. We assess barriers to efficient iPSC transduction including receptor-dependent entry deficits and activation of p53-dependent DNA damage responses. Although AAV is widely described as non-integrating, evidence indicates that integration events occur in rapidly proliferating and actively reprogramming cells. Critically, we synthesize evidence that cell-type-specific promoters lose fidelity when paired with neurogenic transgene payloads, a cross-tissue problem not addressed in existing AAV reviews, and that published in vivo reprogramming efficiencies may be substantially confounded by promoter leakage in the absence of formal lineage tracing. These aspects, underrepresented in recent platform-level reviews, are specifically emphasized here as a resource for researchers designing rigorous AAV-based reprogramming and gene therapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.